color cycle (slow)

Kistaro Windrider, Reptillian Situation Assessor

Unfortunately, I Really Am That Nerdy

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Please insert a disk into the (null)
nyah, tongueout, glasses, nerd
kistaro

A comment from the discussion thread on today's issue of Error'd, from which the above image was pulled:
Re: Poor Bananas
2008-08-15 09:19 • by ath (unregistered) 212269

"Insert the disk into the (null)" is so much more than just an error message. It's a Zen-error message which requires years of pondering before you understand it's true meaning... OK, Linux has a slightly steeper learning curve than Windows...

I've thought about this a bit, and "ath" is both right and wrong- as, of course, the teachings of Zen would offer, as "right" and "wrong" are in and of themselves an illusory dichotomy. (The concept of "wrong" is, therefore, in and of itself, wrong. Do I contradict myself? So I contradict myself; I am many, I contain multitudes.) He's right that the error message is indeed a path to satori approached correctly, but wrong that it takes years to comprehend it. It really only took me a few minutes*.

The hidden meaning here is understanding what is meant by the (null). It seems, at first glance, like a mere unfulfilled placeholder, an unfortunate glitch in the computer's logic. But it runs much deeper than this. From a technical standpoint, there is no reason for the parentheses. Most string format functions that take a null use, indeed, "null", as in the default text-printing behavior of Java and several similar languages; there are no parentheses. So "null" is generally a drop-in, which means the parentheses would always be there- and hence, the correct message might read something like "Please insert a disk into the (\dev\cdrom0)", in which the parentheses confuse the situation even worse. Therefore, this is no simple "null"; it is, instead, a (null), a concept explicitly searched for in the program and then not used as a reason to summarily terminate the program, which is a CD burner and therefore only useful when your CD-burning device seems to exist.

So again, we must revert to Zen-driven world-view concepts: the illusory, farcical nature of that which we believe to be physical reality. The hollow, frivolous nature of things becomes very apparent after minimal study (see YouTube and the popularity of America's Funniest Home Groin Injuries Videos for evidence, which has nothing to do with the actual hollowness of the universe, of infinitesimal omniescent souls as single points in n space living within their own structured arbitrary weavings) and it is a common old chestnut of many religions, especially Buddhism of all forms, and to a greater degree Zen except when it is less so, that nothing truly exists. So therefore, the program is correct, and very correct to handle this situation, as it is not only expected, it is the only situation: your CD-ROM drive can most accurately be described as a (null), as whatever properties it has, that one is most assuredly correct; and as your CD-ROM drive is a (null), it has no other properties, as it has no properties at all, because it indeed is nothing. No other descriptor would be accurate.

At first, there seems to be an obvious problem with this. The logic that observes your CD-ROM drive to be (null) applies to everything. The error message is suggesting you place your disk anywhere you wish it to be: your CD-ROM drive, your VCR, your toaster oven. (For we want the toaster to be happy, too.) This, to the illusion-shackled mind, is plainly ridiculous; a computer- based CD-burning program needs a CD in what seems to be your CD-ROM drive to burn content onto the equally nonexistent media. (And yet the information exists, as there is an underlying concept there that can be perceived, and the nonexistent disk is a perfectly valid way of carrying those concepts. Why?) To believe in this error, however, is to betray the content of the original message.

The message is perfectly accurate. It would recommend that you put your disk into the (null), without being any more specific than that. The message has no need to be specific. If it believed in your CD-ROM drive, it would have recommended it. But, indeed, you can insert your disk into any of the (null) you want, because it doesn't matter in the slightest; the program isn't going to fucking work anyway.

And that is the true meaning of that error message.



* No, not a few minutes to become enlightened from one error message. That happened a couple weeks ago.**
** Actually, yes, despite my not, before that point, considering myself particulary Buddhist. I still don't agree with the stated purpose of satori, which is to not exist as your consciousness and passions are revealed as illusions; I instead conclude that what you thought was your consciousness feels like it has failed to exist because it is the first time you are confronted with how limited it had been before finding the rest of it. I probably should have posted about this three weeks ago, but at the time, it seemed both too obvious and too impossible to explain to bother to post. It still does.

  • 1
They need to give you more work to do at Microsoft. :E
Just select a drive next time before proceeding and go on. :P

That's interesting - a Zen-but-not-Zen (0.5 Zen? keeping with nonduality) idea of that what's being sought isn't really nothingness, but a way of breaking through the limits of the interface.

The interface rules us in the way an interpreter does in a land where you only have the one interpreter and you can't talk directly to the people you meet.

Wow. Thank you for sharing this. It set me off on contemplation.

I was hoping at least someone would take this post seriously. It's both comedic and spiritual- the message is funny, and my conclusion is funny, and the entire concept of applying spiritual reasoning to a coding blunder resulting in a weird error message is ridiculous- but it's a sort of ridiculous that can help to express that spiritual belief system, and how I apply it, and how it works in my mind. Actually, I admit I had you specifically in mind as someone likely to understand the spiritual aspects at work here.

Oh yes. I have a long way to go before I gain any insight and understanding on a great many spiritual topics but I'm so very intrigued by the ideas I keep coming across.

This part:

"I still don't agree with the stated purpose of satori, which is to not exist as your consciousness and passions are revealed as illusions; I instead conclude that what you thought was your consciousness feels like it has failed to exist because it is the first time you are confronted with how limited it had been before finding the rest of it. I probably should have posted about this three weeks ago, but at the time, it seemed both too obvious and too impossible to explain to bother to post. It still does."

...rings a bell in me.

x-posted w/o strikethrough (since I can't possibly remember how to format THAT in the Paradice forums). Speaking of which, mayhap you could sit in over there and explain to us why the forums are named 'Chair.'?

  • 1
?

Log in

No account? Create an account